Webflow vs Framer (2026): Best No-Code Website Builder?
Webflow and Framer are the two leading design-centric no-code website builders. Webflow has been the industry standard for years; Framer has surged in popularity with its modern, component-based approach. Both produce stunning websites without code. Here's how to choose.
⚡ Quick Verdict
Webflow is the better choice for complex websites that need a powerful CMS, ecommerce, client projects, and deep customization. Framer is better for fast, beautiful marketing sites and landing pages with its modern interface and built-in motion. Framer is easier to learn; Webflow is more powerful.
Webflow vs Framer: Feature Comparison
| Feature | Webflow | Framer |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✅ (Webflow branding) | ✅ (Framer branding) |
| Starting Price | $14/mo (Basic) | $5/mo (Mini) |
| Design Flexibility | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| CMS | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Ecommerce | ✅ Built-in | ❌ |
| Animations | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Interactions) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (built-in motion) |
| Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Learning Curve | Steep | Moderate |
| Components | ✅ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (React-like) |
| Best For | Complex sites, agencies | Marketing sites, startups |
Pricing
Framer is more affordable — plans start at $5/month (Mini) with custom domains. Webflow starts at $14/month (Basic). For small sites and landing pages, Framer offers excellent value. Webflow's CMS and ecommerce plans are pricier but more capable.
Design Experience
Webflow uses a CSS-based box model that gives you complete control over every property — it's essentially visual CSS. Framer uses a more modern, Figma-like canvas with components, variants, and smart layout. Designers coming from Figma will find Framer more intuitive; web developers will appreciate Webflow's CSS control.
CMS & Content
Webflow's CMS is more mature and powerful — it supports complex content structures, references, multi-image fields, and dynamic pages. Framer's CMS has improved significantly but is still simpler. For content-heavy sites (blogs, directories, portfolios), Webflow is stronger.
Performance
Framer sites tend to be faster out of the box — they're built on Next.js and automatically optimized. Webflow sites can be fast but require more attention to asset optimization and clean structure. For Core Web Vitals, Framer has an edge.
🏆 Our Verdict
Webflow is the better choice for complex websites that need a powerful CMS, ecommerce, client projects, and deep customization. Framer is better for fast, beautiful marketing sites and landing pages with its modern interface and built-in motion. Framer is easier to learn; Webflow is more powerful.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Framer replacing Webflow?
Not yet. Framer is growing fast for marketing sites, but Webflow remains stronger for complex projects, ecommerce, and agency work. They're converging but serve different sweet spots.
Can I build an ecommerce store with Framer?
Not natively. Framer doesn't have built-in ecommerce. You'd need to integrate with Shopify or similar. Webflow has native ecommerce.
Which has better SEO?
Both produce SEO-friendly sites. Framer's Next.js foundation gives it slight technical SEO advantages (faster, cleaner HTML). Webflow offers more granular SEO controls (meta tags, redirects, sitemap customization).
Can I use Framer with Figma?
Framer has a Figma-like interface but doesn't directly import from Figma. Webflow has a Figma-to-Webflow plugin. Both tools are inspired by Figma's design approach.